Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time

GLM-5.3-Flash scores 48.8 on AutomationBench, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8's 41.0 and GPT-5.6 Terra's 37.2, at a per-task cost of about $0.045.

1

Sources

50%

Confidence

Short-term (~14 days)

Relevance

10/12/2026

First Seen

This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.

Valid until: 10/26/2026(expired)

Sources

18B Active for Just $0.045: How GLM-5.3-Flash Beat Claude with Hybrid Attention

Related Entities

GLM-5.3-Flashmodel AutomationBenchconcept Claude Opus 4.8model GPT-5.6 Terramodel

Related Claims

UnverifiedIn Automation Bench at medium reasoning intensity, GPT-6.1 Sol scored 35.4%, which is 2.2 percentage points higher than Opus 5.5 at one-third of the cost.79% similar UnverifiedGLM-5.3-Flash scores 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, slightly below Claude Opus 4.8's 85.0 and GPT-5.6 Terra's 87.4.79% similar UnverifiedGLM-5.3-Flash scores 78.4 on Toolathlon Verified and 62.4 on OfficeQA Pro, both ahead of Claude Opus 4.8.71% similar UnverifiedGLM-5.3-Flash achieved a score of 57 on the Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index evaluation, on par with Claude Opus 4.8.69% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI

https://kongchang.com/claim/1007333

API

curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1007333

MCP

get_claim(id=1007333)