Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Some commentators believe that although the U.S. kill switch risk is real, the probability of it being triggered remains relatively low, and that the real threat often requires an extreme geopolitical event to materialize.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe low-probability, high-impact risk framework originates from expected utility theory and catastrophic risk research.63% similarVerifiedOver-refusal strategies reduce risk but harm model utility, especially in scenarios such as professional development and security research that require touching sensitive boundaries.62% similarUnverifiedCritics point out that the low-probability, high-impact framework has room for manipulation—probabilities can be arbitrarily lowered and impacts can be arbitrarily raised—making it easy to fall into Pascal's-wager-style argumentation traps.62% similarUnverifiedExcessive focus on distant doomsday scenarios may divert governance resources away from present, real harms.61% similarUnverifiedGeneral-purpose large language models exhibit inconsistency in security judgments, and the same risky operation may bypass their security mechanisms simply by being rephrased or provided with a justifying context60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1011023API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1011023MCP
get_claim(id=1011023)