Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The author proposes an AI writing pipeline: write detailed instructions, show positive and negative examples, attach the full text of the best work, use a cheap open-source model to generate multiple drafts, use a high-thinking-level judge from another lab to select or merge them according to a rubric, use another judge to run one or two rounds of review-and-edit, and keep a human final check.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCreators should deeply rewrite AI-generated drafts by injecting personal viewpoints, examples, and language habits, allowing content to pass through a human filter rather than directly copying machine output.75% similarUnverifiedThe workflow saves the reply as a draft rather than sending it directly, adopting a division of labor model of 'AI drafts, human does final review'.74% similarVerifiedThe platform adopts a design philosophy of AI generation with human editability, where AI handles the first draft and the final judgment and revision authority is handed over to testers.74% similarUnverifiedThis article was written with AI assistance and is part of an AI-assisted publishing experiment.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1011131API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1011131MCP
get_claim(id=1011131)