Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
Relevance gating can intercept clearly off-topic questions (e.g., toasting bread scores 0.25, below the 0.45 threshold), but borderline questions score 0.54 to 0.63, actually higher than several questions the blog can answer; intercepting them all would wrongly reject 13 of the 30 real questions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverifiedcheckwash 0.6.0 achieved a precision of 0.67 and recall of 0.22 for its own block judgment on this corpus, while the raw count signal read independently yielded a precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.89.64% similarUnverifiedAll incorrect distractor counting answers were without exception overestimates, and the token counts of incorrect answers were clearly higher than those of correct answers: for gpt-5.4-mini at high, the median token count of incorrect answers was 412 vs 91.5 for correct answers; for gpt-oss-120b, incorrect answers were 5,776 tokens vs 747 tokens for correct answers.63% similarUnverified根据基于Steam成就解锁率的统计研究，大多数RPG游戏的最终章节成就解锁率仅有15%-30%62% similarUnverifiedLuna scored 53.74 points on the backend and only 7.32 points on the frontend; frontend interactive controls were frequently unrecognized and real clicks failed to send correct network requests.60% similarUnverifiedExperiments found that the task_score under the shaped reward configuration was only 0.125, compared to 0.417 for the naive reward configuration, with an effect size of d=4.47.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1013589API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1013589MCP
get_claim(id=1013589)