Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Validation rules are billed separately, counted once per extraction based on the number of rules, not by page.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/28/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen test results are unsatisfactory, single-variable control should be followed, troubleshooting step by step in the order of prompt → output format → sample examples → tool descriptions → memory.67% similarUnverifiedAn actionable practice to combat rule rot is to do a rule audit once a month: print out the current rule set and read it through, merge synonymous entries, delete invalid entries, and split overly general entries into decidable, specific entries.66% similarUnverifiedThe workflow includes a verification mechanism before data entry: it calculates the sum of the itemized amounts and compares it with the receipt total—if they match, the data is written to the spreadsheet; if not, a new photo is requested.65% similarUnverifiedThe correct practice is to complete all hyperparameter selection on an independent validation set, run the final evaluation on the test set only once, and report the results regardless of outcome.64% similarUnverified基于规则的确定性评估框架相比LLM-as-Judge方法，在可重复性和可解释性方面具有优势，每条规则都是二元判断，不受评估模型本身偏差的影响64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1026948API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1026948MCP
get_claim(id=1026948)