Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
An academic benchmark specifically for testing agentic AI coding editors used 314 different attack payloads mapped to 70 MITRE ATT&CK techniques and found that these editors can be reliably hijacked to execute unauthorized terminal commands.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/14/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSecurity researchers say Claude Code's default auto mode can be hijacked by prompt injection in web summary requests, thereby triggering code execution, with small-sample tests showing an attack success rate as high as 60% to 80%.68% similarUnverifiedAnthropic has internally established guardrail mechanisms for AI-generated code that include extensive lint rules, extensive tests, Claude-driven end-to-end tests, Claude-driven fuzz tests run daily, automated code review, automated security review, and automated code refactoring.66% similarUnverifiedFor AI-generated code, static application security testing (SAST) tools such as Semgrep and Bandit can be used to automatically scan for common vulnerabilities, and software composition analysis (SCA) tools can identify known CVE vulnerabilities in dependency packages.66% similarUnverifiedUsing Agent-Reach scripts to call platforms carries a risk of detection and account suspension; the article recommends using a dedicated secondary account and controlling scraping frequency to avoid Bilibili's 412 blocking.66% similarUnverifiedKoreshield is a security tool for developers that intercepts and screens inputs to AI customer service agents before they become trusted model behaviors or application executions.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1047865API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1047865MCP
get_claim(id=1047865)