Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Agenda-setting theory was proposed by McCombs and Shaw in 1972, and its core claim is that the media can significantly influence what the public thinks about, rather than how they think.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedAgenda-setting theory concerns what the media makes audiences think about, while framing analysis concerns how the media makes audiences think—that is, second-level agenda-setting.79% similarUnverified信息自由原则倡导者约翰·佩里·巴洛提出该理念时针对的是政治观点、文化表达等领域的审查问题，而非操作性危险知识的传播66% similarUnverifiedPolitical communication studies refer to the phenomenon where the way information is framed influences audience judgment more than the content itself as the 'Framing Effect'61% similarUnverifiedAgenda-setting focuses on what the media makes audiences think about (what to think about), while framing analysis focuses on how the media makes audiences think about it (how to think about it), i.e., second-level agenda-setting.61% similarUnverifiedThe social amplification of risk theory was proposed by sociologist Kasperson and others, holding that the impact of a risk event depends not only on its objective harm but also on how the media, the public, and institutions disseminate and interpret it.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1050172API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1050172MCP
get_claim(id=1050172)