Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The uploader suggests confirming AI edits one by one in Claude Code rather than enabling "allow all edits for this session", because the AI can still make mistakes, and atomic-level confirmation is an important safeguard for project safety.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedXing Bu recommends using AI programming tools such as Claude Code to help understand the code, and emphasizes that with AI tools, the worry about not being able to do the work after joining a company can basically be dismissed.78% similarVerifiedSome engineers have pointed out that AI-generated code has issues in security review and performance optimization.77% similarUnverifiedRunning an AI Agent on an isolated draft branch ensures that even if completely incorrect code is generated, deleting the draft branch leaves the main branch state entirely unaffected.76% similarUnverifiedClaude Code的逐步审批设计与Anthropic在AI安全研究中强调的可控性原则一致，是Constitutional AI训练方法的延伸体现73% similarVerifiedA 2022 Stanford University study found that developers using AI coding assistants had a significantly higher probability of writing code containing security vulnerabilities compared to a control group that did not use AI.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1056694API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1056694MCP
get_claim(id=1056694)