Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the agent engineering phase, humans are responsible for defining intent, reviewing plans and outputs, approving, and deciding whether to iterate; agents are responsible for understanding intent, formulating plans, executing, producing artifacts, and verifying.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedHuman-agent collaboration design refers to explicitly defining the timing, manner, and permission boundaries of human intervention in agent workflows; the article lists human takeover points and degradation mechanisms as core elements of agent system design, because fully autonomous agents are not yet acceptable in regulated enterprise environments.80% similarUnverifiedThe principle proposed by this solution is: the agent is responsible for proposing, humans are responsible for approving, and infrastructure is responsible for executing.78% similarUnverifiedSound agent design should insert approval mechanisms at critical action points, distinguishing between operations that can be executed automatically and those that must be confirmed by a human.77% similarUnverifiedThe agent toolchain is shifting from simulating human operations toward a structured, verifiable execution layer, with permission control and effect verification being the key elements in making this type of technology production-ready.75% similarUnverifiedIn the context of agent engineering, artifacts broadly refer to the persistable, inspectable intermediate and final results produced during agent execution, including implementation plans, task decomposition checklists, modified files, terminal commands and outputs, test reports, screenshots, or architecture descriptions.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1059410API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1059410MCP
get_claim(id=1059410)