Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Of about 1,200 judge calls, two failed due to JSON escaping format errors; on one day the judge's responses became ten times slower and context precision timed out on 16 of 18 questions, because RAGAS's timeout limit covers all calls for a single question and single metric, and precision makes 8 judge calls per question when k=8.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedRetry rates usually stem from three types of events: vendor-side rate limiting (429 errors), network timeouts, and model outputs failing structured validation (such as JSON parsing failures or invalid tool-call parameters).61% similarUnverifiedWhen a reviewer's self-reported areas are too broad, too obscure, or severely misaligned with that year's submission distribution, the matching score may fall below the system threshold, causing that reviewer to enter a pending pool and remain unassigned for a long time.60% similarUnverified基于规则的分类方案P99延迟通常在1毫秒以内，但难以处理语义歧义59% similarUnverifiedThe original article's scheme assigns weights to different failure categories: prompt injection failures weight 5, JSON formatting errors weight 3, multi-hop reasoning wrong answers weight 2, with the final score calculated on a weighted basis.59% similarUnverifiedIn the fixture example samples.json, the three samples of the install paragraph are highly consistent in wording and receive a MODEL-DRAFT / HUMAN-APPROVE verdict; the three samples of the retry-behavior paragraph claim 3, 5, and 2 retries respectively, with backoff times ranging from 200ms to 100ms to 250ms, triggering a disputed-claim check and a HUMAN verdict.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065199API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065199MCP
get_claim(id=1065199)