Unverified50% confidenceReleaseExact time
The researchers released the annotated corpus, judge prompts, and analysis code to promote more transparent safety evaluation.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study designed a utility scoring system: correct answers gain points, incorrect answers lose points, and abstaining is a neutral safe option72% similarUnverifiedThe paper notes that interpretability techniques can be used for auditing—that is, verifying whether dangerous capabilities have been genuinely removed rather than merely suppressed on the surface.70% similarUnverifiedThe study is accompanied by a companion archive containing a frozen benchmark test set, evaluation audit logs, raw responses from the consensus experiments, and analysis code.69% similarUnverified锚定样本技术在评估提示词中加入已由人类专家标注明确分数的示例，覆盖评分量表各个档位，可帮助裁判模型准确理解评分标准69% similarUnverifiedThe paper proposes several directions for developing agent trustworthiness evaluation methods, extending trustworthiness assessment from output verification to scrutiny of the cognitive process itself.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065982API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065982MCP
get_claim(id=1065982)