Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Vaughn emphasizes that in safety-related actions, a single missed detection is enough to lose trust, and there will never be 100% accuracy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedConfidence itself does not improve accuracy; its value lies in supporting routing by confidence, and the mechanism's effectiveness depends on whether confidence is calibrated—when discrimination is insufficient, threshold routing degrades into random routing.67% similarUnverifiedThere is an inherent tension in dangerous capability assessments between the coverage, update frequency, and confidentiality of test sets: overly public test sets become incorporated into training data and lose effectiveness, while overly confidential tests lack peer-review credibility.63% similarUnverifiedNaïve confidence-stratified comparisons are unreliable because uncontrolled detection strength can confound conclusions.62% similarUnverifiedImplicit rate limiting does not display explicit prompts, and is typically used to prevent attackers from reverse-engineering a system's specific thresholds based on error information.59% similarUnverifiedIn safety alignment, if features are selected by probe scores, since the direction agreement rate is only 17%–35%, features whose post-intervention effect is opposite or ineffective are likely to be selected, causing safety measures to fail or even backfire.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1070253API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1070253MCP
get_claim(id=1070253)