Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The OSD constrains only the terms of the license itself and places no requirements on the identity, purpose or political stance of users.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Open Source Initiative Shifts Toward Political Activism: OSI Mission Change Sparks Controversy
youtubeThe Lunduke Journal10/19/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOSI对开源的认定要求许可证允许自由使用、修改和分发，且不得对特定领域或用途加以限制72% similarVerifiedElastic License 2.0 prohibits offering the software as a managed service to third parties and does not conform to the OSI open source definition.62% similarUnverifiedThe OSD contains ten core conditions, covering requirements such as free redistribution, source code availability, permission of derivative works, and non-discrimination against specific persons or fields.59% similarUnverifiedMIT、BSD等宽松协议不包含专利授权条款59% similarUnverifiedThe MIT license only constrains how REA's own code may be used; it grants no legal authorization or endorsement for users' analysis activities, and users must still determine for themselves whether the analysis target involves copyright, trade secrets, or anti-circumvention provisions (such as DMCA Section 1201).57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1071772API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1071772MCP
get_claim(id=1071772)