Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
On Windows, multiple agents concurrently writing to the same JSON file should use atomic writes (write to a temporary file first, then rename to replace) together with retries with short backoff; after the fix, more than 6,000 concurrent reads had zero errors.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSorting the keys of the workflow JSON and serializing it with nodes stably sorted by name makes the same logic produce a byte-for-byte identical file on every export.66% similarUnverifiedDifferent models adhere to JSON Schema to varying degrees and may omit required fields, write numbers as strings, change key names in nested objects, or return explanatory text instead of JSON.65% similarUnverifiedUsing JSONL append writes instead of JSON overwrite writes is the standard practice for idempotent tasks: each line of JSONL is independent, and an interrupted write only loses the last line; with overwrite-style JSON, an interrupted write corrupts the entire file and progress returns to zero.64% similarUnverifiedjsonb 以二进制格式存储 JSON，写入时完成解析，读取时无需重新解析，支持 GIN 索引实现任意嵌套键值的快速查询64% similarUnverifiedWhen having AI process documents, you should explicitly specify which fields to extract and enforce JSON format returns, in order to obtain structured output usable by downstream nodes.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1075068API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1075068MCP
get_claim(id=1075068)