Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
OAuth consent records are usually scattered across individual authorization servers or application sides, making it difficult for enterprises to obtain a unified cross-application view, which leaves security teams lacking centralized intervention means when agents are abused or permissions drift.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe OAuth 2.0 opaque token scheme achieves real-time revocation capability through token introspection, but every protected API request must bear an additional network round trip to the authorization server, making the introspection endpoint a shared bottleneck in high-throughput scenarios.71% similarUnverifiedIn the delegation chain of a multi-agent system, even if each hop looks legitimate when checked individually, the original user may never have been authorized to export that information, the database connector's permissions may be broader than the initiating user's, and the final destination may violate the organization's data residency or confidentiality policies.69% similarUnverifiedOAuth 2.0（RFC 6749）和OpenID Connect（OIDC）提供跨平台身份联合标准框架，但实际工程中不同平台安全要求差异迫使服务商叠加大量平台专属扩展68% similarUnverifiedDefault configurations determine the actual security posture of the vast majority of users, because most teams will not review and tighten every network policy item by item.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1076846API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1076846MCP
get_claim(id=1076846)