Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Artificial Analysis evaluated Devinfusion: with Claude Opus 5.5 as the primary model and GPT-6 Luna as an auxiliary model working in parallel, it scored about 68 on its Coding Agent Index, roughly 2 points higher than the specified Claude Code combination, at 31% lower cost per task.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Comprehensive Intelligence Index consists of 9 independent evaluations including agentic work, coding, scientific reasoning, and general capability; Sol and Faber-5 are nearly on par with a difference of only 1 point, but task completion time was reduced by approximately 61% and cost was approximately half.71% similarUnverifiedGPT-6's claimed 50% price reduction refers to the API unit price, while Claude's claimed 40% reduction refers to task cost in official benchmarks; the two use different calculation methods and cannot be directly compared.71% similarUnverifiedArtificial Analysis gave GPT-6.1 Sol a score of 52, only one point below Astra, with benchmark run costs at one-quarter of Astra's and 31% cheaper than 6 Sol.69% similarUnverifiedCognition states that SWE-2 scores only one point below Anthropic's Claude model on its own coding benchmarks, yet costs 64% less68% similarUnverifiedFor Claude Opus 5.5, which can already solve 96% of tasks on its own, running it in BLM mode reduced model calls and per-task cost by about 98% and additionally solved 2 tasks.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1081848API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1081848MCP
get_claim(id=1081848)