Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The ranking ability of listing-time features for settlement disputes reached an AUC of 0.78, but the average precision was only 0.012.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn synthetic data with 10,000 samples, a 1% positive rate, and 495 negatives scoring 0.90 while the positives score 0.80 and 0.60 respectively, computing with a 0.5 threshold gives: ROC-AUC=0.9500, Average Precision=0.1449, precision=0.1681, recall=1.0000, accuracy=0.9505, TP=100, FP=495, TN=9405, FN=0.78% similarVerifiedAccording to common industry standards, AUC > 0.9 is excellent, 0.8–0.9 is good, 0.7–0.8 is fair, 0.5–0.7 is poor, and 0.5 is equivalent to random guessing.77% similarUnverifiediPSAE评分对Binder二分类预测的AUC仅为0.65，远低于可靠分类器水平77% similarUnverifiedEven in the hottest setting, at a 1% false-positive cutoff, 11% of rewrites were still flagged, and the AUC against the rewrite null hypothesis was still 0.67.75% similarUnverifiedThe authors used an LLM judge to identify suspicious reports and obtained an AUROC of 0.48 (no better than random), whereas a simple TF-IDF word-frequency classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.65.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1084235API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1084235MCP
get_claim(id=1084235)