Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The authors validate RCD on five reasoning benchmarks, and the results show that RCD improves answer accuracy compared with standard CoT.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedRCD's experiments are concentrated on five reasoning benchmarks, and cross-domain generalization still requires more verification.75% similarUnverified使用思维链（CoT）提示要求裁判先分析再打分可将裁判与人工标注的一致性提升约7-12%66% similarUnverifiedCoT-SC利用大模型输出的随机性，对同一问题多次调用后对结果投票取多数，能显著提升推理结果的可靠性62% similarUnverifiedThe paper reports a pre-registered study that tested four predictors on two datasets, in which all seven confirmatory certificates were positive, and the eighth pair failed the pilot.61% similarUnverifiedThe representation sparsity findings are validated with generalization across a seven-point sweep and a second corpus.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1084520API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1084520MCP
get_claim(id=1084520)