Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
The limitations of content provenance authentication: a signature can only prove that the file has not been modified, not that the filmed content itself was not staged; and the ecosystem is not yet widespread, making it hard for ordinary users to invoke in everyday disputes.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/20/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDigitally signing tool definitions does not solve the poisoning problem, because signatures provide integrity and authorship attribution rather than security—a signed description can still carry malicious instructions.69% similarUnverifiedWhen a validator only checks whether the cryptographic signature matches without checking whether the exclusion range covers the actual content, the signature may be mathematically valid but cover zero bytes, leaving the content entirely unprotected.68% similarUnverifiedThe dual nature of running locally without cloud review: it removes platform restrictions on themes and content, but content compliance responsibility falls entirely on the user, and when copyrighted material, real people's likenesses, or sensitive themes are involved, the risk is borne by the creator.68% similarUnverified应把检索到的内容（邮件、附件、文档）视为不可信，敏感凭证不应出现在模型可见的上下文中68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1085520API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1085520MCP
get_claim(id=1085520)