Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
This Codex skill cannot replace professional penetration testing, but it can serve as a first low-cost screening; its output should be treated as leads rather than conclusions, and suspicious items still need manual review after being found.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCodex itself does not have the ability to discover vulnerabilities; it relies on the goals and ideas provided by the user, and its output still requires human verification and debugging.73% similarUnverifiedThe industry's commonly cited "needle in a haystack" test can only prove that a model can retrieve an isolated fact from a long text; it cannot reflect real performance when multiple pieces of information are interwoven and reasoning is required.71% similarUnverifiedWhen requirements are unclear, Codex will ask clarifying questions first rather than hard-coding a potentially incorrect solution.70% similarUnverifiedBenchmark tests have limitations, and high scores do not necessarily equate to real-world application capability.68% similarUnverifiedIf the same agent can both fabricate observations and rewrite the mandatory check set, the acceptance gate cannot provide any guarantee.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1087145API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1087145MCP
get_claim(id=1087145)