Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Evaluation in EpiSEM-Bench not only gives binary safe/unsafe verdicts but further determines the minimal failure base observed, including failures that still occur when the evidence is complete and cases where no failure is observed even after exhaustive testing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedMost benchmarks use accuracy as the core metric, counting both wrong answers and refusals as incorrect and not distinguishing the difference in harm.72% similarUnverifiedThe score range is 0-100, and a hard threshold (for example 85) is declared in advance; anything below the threshold is judged a failure, making the acceptance conclusion recordable, comparable, and traceable.70% similarUnverifiedBefore seeing evaluation scores, agree with the person accountable for results on launch thresholds in advance, including the passing score for typical cases and the types of failures that are unacceptable at any rate (mustNotFail cases).69% similarUnverifiedIf anomaly detection does not give a confidence level and attribution results do not state the method, then their conclusions can only serve as clues rather than definitive findings.68% similarUnverifiedThe paper proves finite-time guarantees for policy evaluation and sparse sampling, with estimation error independent of the risk level.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1088292API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1088292MCP
get_claim(id=1088292)