Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The 54-second rope animation produced by GPT 6.1 Sol at medium reasoning effort clearly shows the rope passing over and under, whereas neither version of Kimi K3.1's animation makes the rope's occlusion and interleaving relationships recognizable.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/24/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/7/2026
Sources
Kimi K3.1 Open-Weight Model Hands-On: 3 Trillion Parameters Take On Closed-Source Giants
youtubeMatthew Berman10/24/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a climbing-knot animation comparison, the output of GPT-6.1 (6.1 Sole Medium) was about 10% to 15% better than K3.1 in spatial relationships.66% similarUnverifiedgpt-6-luna reasons at medium effort by default unless reasoning.effort is explicitly set; effort can range from none to max.64% similarUnverifiedGPT-6 Sol exhibited lid clipping and component interpenetration issues in the 3D contact lens case task, with Opus ultimately scoring 10 points and Sol scoring 6 points.63% similarUnverifiedGPT-6.1 Sol's progress in following structured rubrics may be the main source of the 25% improvement in deviation capture rate.62% similarUnverifiedThe poster speculated that GPT-6 and GPT-6.1 Sol share the same pre-training base but adopt different post-training schemes and differ in the number of recurrent passes.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1092558API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1092558MCP
get_claim(id=1092558)