Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The initial failure was because the rule "another app is in the foreground, bring the display interface back" triggered before the model was consulted, causing the agent to wrongly interfere with the user's operation, with a success rate of 0/20.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/24/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe fault tolerance of interface operations is far lower than that of API calls, as pop-ups or page redesigns can both cause agent interruptions, making reliability a core challenge.73% similarUnverifiedThe experiments injected faults such as application crashes, background service hangs, backend unavailability and simulated human interference on real hardware, running each scenario 20 times.71% similarUnverifiedThe risk of false positives—incorrectly classifying normal agent behavior as out-of-bounds and quarantining it—will directly affect the platform's practical utility.69% similarUnverified底层模型更换后，即便微小的输出分布变化也可能导致此前校准的安全护栏过度拦截或防护失效，需要重新标注和调试69% similarUnverifiedTraditional observability focuses on technical failure signals (exceptions, error codes, timeouts, tool unavailability), but in agent scenarios what is truly dangerous is successful violations where a call succeeds and returns 200 but the business action crosses the line.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1092969API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1092969MCP
get_claim(id=1092969)