Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The author himself explicitly states that he seeks "blunt feedback," indicating that the content has not yet undergone systematic peer review.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/24/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/7/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified该独立研究者的Phrasome Theory框架获得了期刊评审具有原创性的鼓励性反馈，但最终未获发表71% similarUnverifiedSome conferences allow authors to submit confidential comments to the AC.65% similarUnverifiedAs of publication, the HN discussion thread has accumulated hundreds of comments, with most participants expressing understanding or even admiration for the author's decision to exit the project.65% similarUnverifiedOver the past two weeks, five readers sent corrections to the author, all about the validator rather than the validated object; this was the sixth issue of the same kind but no one sent it, and the author found it by re-running the measurement before publishing an article that depends on it.64% similarUnverifiedA researcher who reviews for both ICLR and AAMAS posted on Reddit, saying that the eight submissions they handled were outrageously poor in quality and advising authors not to submit if they are not ready.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1094474API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1094474MCP
get_claim(id=1094474)