Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
The article points out that natural-language configuration carries ambiguity risk, so the verification layer must be strict enough; otherwise the model may deviate from expectations without anyone noticing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedBy default, large language models tend to choose high-probability, low-risk expressions, and thus easily appear 'safe but mediocre'.78% similarUnverified确定性防护无法处理自然语言层面的隐晦风险，是其主要局限76% similarUnverifiedDeterministic guardrails can only handle fixed-pattern content that looks like sensitive information and cannot detect natural language risks where sentences are fluent but subtly guide users toward incorrect actions.75% similarUnverified高风险操作应要求人工审批，并将所有自然语言输入视为不可信，以防范智能体目标劫持75% similarUnverifiedFor inputs that are ambiguous, in natural language, or require intent disambiguation, the model is the more appropriate choice.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1098509API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1098509MCP
get_claim(id=1098509)