Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the scenario where the corner of the grid search already contains the answer, the best fixed configuration reaches 95% validation accuracy in only 317 ± 29 steps, whereas PBT needs an average of 2667 ± 2244 steps; on every seed, PBT is slower.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAmong PBT runs started from the dead zone, slow PBT (updating once every several steps) succeeded 0/3 times, but fast PBT (updating every 100 steps, multiplying lr by 0.5 or 2) achieved 3/3 success in about 6850 steps on average.71% similarUnverifiedUnder an 18k character budget, anchored hybrid retrieval achieved 36.18% accuracy, BM25 achieved 35.98%, while the best direct planner-guided method reached only 34.19%.68% similarPartially VerifiedMicrosoft reported that Decision-1 achieved the highest accuracy in a comparison across 36 benchmarks covering nearly 150,000 questions, and claimed its P50 latency is approximately 35 times faster than GPT-6 Sol.67% similarUnverifiedTop-p (nucleus sampling) dynamically truncates to the smallest set of tokens whose cumulative probability exceeds the threshold p.67% similarUnverifiedThe P-256 generation process skipped the 876th candidate; Filippo counted that the number of valid seeds is about twice the published number, and he identified one extra rejection rule (the bit length of n must not exceed p), but the second rule remains unknown.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1099232API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1099232MCP
get_claim(id=1099232)