Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Confidence does not equal correctness; a high-confidence wrong prediction is more dangerous than a low-confidence one because it misleads downstream decisions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDenser relevance judgments reduce the probability that correct results retrieved by a model are mistakenly judged as irrelevant, thereby improving evaluation reliability.78% similarUnverifiedThe cautious camp emphasizes that mistaking statistical correlation for logical reasoning may lead to an overestimation of AI reliability.77% similarUnverifiedIn high-stakes scenarios such as education, the cost of false positives is far higher than that of false negatives, and the false positive rate metric should be the primary focus.76% similarUnverifiedSystematic magnitude errors are more insidious and more dangerous than random errors, because the answers appear numerically plausible in structure yet deviate by an order of magnitude.76% similarUnverifiedThe overconfidence of a model answering directly while skipping retrieval is technically referred to as miscalibration, meaning there is a systematic deviation between confidence and actual accuracy.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1100168API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1100168MCP
get_claim(id=1100168)