Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Without prefilling, this abnormal behavior is rare, but it can be reliably reproduced with a specific prompt combined with prefilling.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedChunked prefill limits each stall to the chunk size by splitting the prompt into chunks and interleaving them with decode steps, but it cannot eliminate the stalls entirely.68% similarUnverifiedLosing the prefill checkpoint at the end of the prompt under sparse sampling conditions can cause state corruption, output deviation, and even non-reproducible generation results.65% similarUnverifiedSafety alignment is not a one-time, irreversible property; fine-tuning, prompt injection, or adversarial inputs can all weaken or bypass this layer of constraint.64% similarUnverifiedIdempotency conflicts can cause only the first write to actually take effect on duplicate writes, with subsequent calls returning success but producing no changes.64% similarUnverifiedCompressing the cache may cause accuracy loss, prefix reuse requires the request structure to be sufficiently stable, and tiered storage requires the scheduling policy to accurately predict cache access—all three types of optimization involve non-free engineering trade-offs.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1101825API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1101825MCP
get_claim(id=1101825)