Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Traditional permission checks typically target a single action or a single Skill rather than cross-Skill information flow and authorization propagation, so static compliance of runtime permissions does not equal compositional safety, and a dynamic, cross-boundary authorization verification mechanism needs to be introduced.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn independent test controller should submit known requests in a secure environment and read the actual routing or approval status, embodying the principle of separation of duties.73% similarUnverifiedSkills Scan通过静态分析技能模块权限声明、动态监测运行时行为、检测技能间危险交互模式来识别组合性安全隐患71% similarUnverifiedCore rules need to be enforced through side channels (such as hard-coded validators, independent rule-checking layers, and deterministic verification) rather than relying on conversational context.71% similarUnverifiedBridging the gap between "configured" and "enforced" requires advancing verification from static checks to runtime, for example periodically using controlled test requests to confirm whether protections actually intercept, and incorporating security status into the observability system.70% similarUnverifiedAuthorization credentials should be bound to the full content of the specific action (parameters, target, context), and when the executor verifies, it checks whether the action about to be executed is consistent with the action at the time the credential was issued, in order to prevent parameter substitution.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1102073API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1102073MCP
get_claim(id=1102073)