Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The paper attributes the inability of prior methods to distinguish different confidence targets to two problems: the reward signals that distinguish different p values are often lost during optimization, and the raw error penalty grows unboundedly as p approaches 1.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe mismatch between P and Q introduces a drift term, causing model weights to be incorrectly updated even without a learning signal.74% similarUnverifiedAblation experiments show that increasing example usage does not yield consistent gains, but instead presents a trade-off relationship between dynamics and reward.71% similarUnverifiedPredictive disagreement arises among independently pretrained PFNs, which is an external manifestation of amortization error.70% similarUnverifiedConfidence itself does not improve accuracy; its value lies in supporting routing by confidence, and the mechanism's effectiveness depends on whether confidence is calibrated—when discrimination is insufficient, threshold routing degrades into random routing.70% similarUnverifiedRewards that are too sparse (scored only at the end of an episode) make it very difficult for the agent to obtain effective gradients through random trial and error.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1102077API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1102077MCP
get_claim(id=1102077)