Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
JEV's recall on the "insufficient information" condition was significantly higher than Qwen's: 56.3% vs. 9.9%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt the 0.81 threshold, the proportion of cached answers that "fit the question" is 5.8 to 10.7 percentage points lower than fresh answers; converted to all responses, the overall quality loss is about 2 to 3 percentage points; Haiku 5.5 has the largest gap (10.7 percentage points), with a cached-answer pass rate of only 67.9%.67% similarUnverifiedZero-shot Jev scores approximately 71% on the DeepSWE benchmark, which is lower than the fine-tuned CLM's 81.6%.65% similarUnverifiedIn zero-shot quality, Jev is the reference benchmark; Drex's vendor reports that on its Decision Index it leads Jev 61.25 to 57.96, but on JevBench it is slightly lower at 85.7% versus Jev's 86.6%; Laya's zero-shot on typed-decisions is only 0.362, below the 0.461 majority-class baseline.65% similarUnverifiedA fusion strategy that prioritizes JEV and only hands off when confidence is below 0.7 collapses into JEV, with approximately 70% of questions never leaving JEV and an ECE of approximately 0.25.63% similarUnverifiedThe hosted model Jev is significantly more accurate on 9 out of 11 decision points, with margins ranging from +10.8 to +46.0 percentage points.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1103057API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1103057MCP
get_claim(id=1103057)