Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On an Ubuntu server, the Rust sentinel took 3.63 nanoseconds to evaluate the stop-loss/take-profit for a single position, 3.62 microseconds for a batch evaluation of 1000 positions, 3.90 microseconds to convert the volume clock for 1000 K-line bars, and 2.88 microseconds for a persistent pipeline IPC round trip from Python to Rust.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/25/2027
Sources
Ditching the Vector Database: SQLite BM25 and a 3.6ns Rust Sentinel for Multi-Agent Refactoring
redditr/LangChain10/27/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe demo output shows: requests spaced about one second apart rather than 0.5 seconds (Crawl-delay overrode the configuration), an exact 2-second wait on 429, a headless 503 getting about 1.1 seconds of jittered backoff, /private requests never leaving the local machine, and the last profile request hitting the daily cap midway through a retry.74% similarUnverified在跨Slack、Linear、Notion和Git仓库评估产品发布风险的场景中，挂载方案某证据收集阶段仅耗时约0.3秒，而MCP方案花费约一分钟并进行21次调用，其中约30秒消耗在工具调用本身70% similarUnverifiedIn this test, when the 7900XTX is run with a 256K context, a single generation takes up to 743 seconds.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1103558API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1103558MCP
get_claim(id=1103558)