Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The interlocutor emphasizes that a proof can be verified line by line and still not be understood; verification and understanding are not the same thing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedFormal verification can only guarantee the internal consistency of a reasoning chain; it cannot automatically determine whether the proposition being proved is semantically fully equivalent to the original conjecture.78% similarUnverifiedThe verifier only answers "whether this statement is supported by real evidence," not "whether the evidence belongs to the current feature," which leads to technically correct but completely irrelevant answers.77% similarUnverifiedTerence Tao advocates for less emphasis on racing to generate proofs first and more emphasis on explanation, review, and knowledge organization, arguing that formal verification alone is far from sufficient.76% similarUnverifiedVerification must be separated from reasoning: neither an agent proposing a solution nor an agent claiming the solution works is sufficient to prove correctness—a connection to deterministic test execution is required.74% similarUnverifiedjev-tools cannot eliminate hallucinations, and a positive judgment does not constitute proof of correctness, because the evidence may be incomplete or the judgment itself may be wrong.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1104672API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1104672MCP
get_claim(id=1104672)