Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
EasyProver's 52.7% pass rate on the Aegis stratified sample shows that implementation details such as fixed-width arithmetic and explicit failure remain difficult, and that the system's performance on larger codebases and longer proof chains, as well as the quality distribution of Aegis-generated specifications, still require independent analysis and verification.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/28/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAegis's aegis sync never automatically modifies or promotes rules, and opens a PR for human review only when the sample size is sufficient (precision is not shown below n=25).75% similarUnverifiedThere is a gap between controlled offline evaluation data and the complex scenarios of real production environments, and many AI systems that perform well in offline evaluations experience performance degradation after going live.68% similarUnverifiedThe false-positive rate of existing AI detection tools remains high, and their accuracy continues to be challenged as models iterate.67% similarUnverifiedBenchmark tests have limitations including data contamination, bias toward specific tech stacks, and inability to measure soft metrics such as code maintainability.64% similarUnverifiedThe paper conducted an experimental evaluation of AegisFlow across five common failure scenarios.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114748API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114748MCP
get_claim(id=1114748)