Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown
In testing, GLM 5.1 achieved a composite score of 89.3, ranking first and surpassing Claude Sonnet 4.6's score of 87.2.
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM 5.2 scored 81 points on Terminal Bench, GLM 5.1 scored 63.5 points, GPT 5.5 scored 84 points, and Opus 4.8 scored 85 points.79% similarUnverifiedSonnet 5's performance is roughly equivalent to GLM 5.2 high, but is priced at approximately three times the cost of the latter and possesses revision capabilities that GLM 5.2 lacks77% similarUnverifiedClaude Sonnet 5 scored 80.4 on Terminal 2.1, 81.2 on computer use, and achieved a GDP evaluation of 1619, surpassing OPUS.77% similarUnverifiedClaude Sonnet 4.6 scored higher than Opus 4.6 on the GDPVal AA benchmark.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13172API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13172MCP
get_claim(id=13172)