Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown
In the easy question, GLM 5.1 added 19 lines of tests, Kimi K2.6 added 12 lines, while the other five models (including Sonnet 4.6) wrote zero lines of tests.
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the medium question (MCP protocol client Signal forwarding), GLM 5.1 wrote 108 lines of tests, which is 1.3 times that of Sonnet and 2 times that of Kimi.75% similarUnverifiedGLM4 ranks fifth in the World of AI benchmark tool.67% similarUnverifiedGLM 5.1, the strongest coding model among domestically produced models, was found in testing to be roughly between Claude Opus 4.5 and Sonnet 4.6 in performance.67% similarUnverifiedGLM-4.7 surpasses DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 in code capability benchmarks.67% similarUnverifiedIn a test of identifying hidden bugs in images, Sonnet 5's Max mode spent approximately 10 minutes and identified all bugs with completely correct results, while Gemini's top-tier model only found 4, and GPT-5.5 X-High failed to detect any.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13174API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13174MCP
get_claim(id=13174)