Expired60% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
DeepSeek V4 Pro leads Qwen3.6 27B Q4 by approximately 6%, and if it had not unexpectedly underperformed on the reasoning-mathematics items, the lead could have exceeded 10%.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro's floating-point operations have been reduced to 27% of the V3.2 version (a 3.7x reduction).73% similarUnverifiedQwen3.5's parameter activation rate is 4.3%, while DeepSeek V3's 671B model has an activation rate of 5.5%.71% similarUnverifiedQwen3-4B is already on par with DeepSeek V3 or GPT-4o on multiple reasoning evaluation metrics.70% similarUnverifiedQwen3 27B is in the same tier as the DeepSeek V-Flash series on the overall intelligence leaderboard, with scores in the 52–53 range.69% similarUnverifiedAccording to Commander Code's official internal benchmark data, DeepSeek V4 Pro outperformed Claude Opus in 6 out of 10 high-difficulty tool-dependent tasks.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/17941API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/17941MCP
get_claim(id=17941)