Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown

When using PX Design, the human hit rate was 72.7%, far higher than the Agents' 44.4%.

1

Sources

90%

Confidence

Medium-term (~90 days)

Relevance

6/1/2026

First Seen

This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.

Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)

Sources

AI Agents vs. Humans in First Wet-Lab Showdown: No Significant Difference in Protein Binder Design Hit Rates

bilibiliBioTender观测日志

Related Entities

PX Designproduct

Related Claims

UnverifiedAdaptive竞赛第一届针对EGFR的Hit Rate为2.5%，第二轮提升到13.2%，今年1月NIPA任务为9.6%，而TRAM-2任务整体Hit Rate突破30%57% similar Unverified消费级PWM舵机的连续工作扭矩往往仅为峰值扭矩的50%~60%56% similar Unverified顶级 AI 会议论文中使用 PyTorch 的比例已超过70%，PyTorch 在学术研究领域的使用率已大幅超过 TensorFlow54% similar Unverified在100帧生成任务的FVD指标上，欧拉运动引导取得76.18，优于最强基线的79.2054% similar UnverifiedAfter using Planning with Files, the AI's structured compliance rate jumped from 6.7% to 96.7%.53% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI

https://kongchang.com/claim/21656

API

curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/21656

MCP

get_claim(id=21656)