Unverified85% confidenceFactTime unknown
2024年美国最高法院在Lindke v. Freed案中裁定，公职人员在特定条件下屏蔽公民可能构成违反第一修正案的行为
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Threads无法屏蔽Meta AI账号：强推AI引发用户权益争议
rss
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Van Buren v. United States that merely accessing information one is authorized to access but for an improper purpose does not constitute a violation of the CFAA.69% similarUnverified最高法院在Printz v. United States（1997）案中确立了反征用原则，限制联邦政府强制调用地方执法资源66% similarUnverifiedIn the 2018 case Carpenter v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established that the aggregation of continuous location data constitutes a substantial intrusion into personal privacy, and government access is subject to Fourth Amendment constraints.63% similarUnverifiedThe 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Van Buren v. United States narrowed the scope of applicability of the CFAA.62% similarVerifiedThe Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), passed in the United States in 2016, provided for the first time a federal civil litigation pathway for trade secret misappropriation, allowing victims to seek emergency injunctive relief from federal courts.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/27372API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/27372MCP
get_claim(id=27372)