Expired85% confidenceFactTime unknown
Zig core contributors stated that even setting aside the LLM issue, Bun's parallel semantic analysis patch would not be accepted, as it needs to be advanced as an overall language-level design
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Zig禁止AI代码贡献的真正原因：投资人而非代码
rss
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedZig core contributors pointed out that even setting aside the LLM issue, Bun's parallel semantic analysis patch would not be accepted, as it is a long-planned feature with far-reaching implications for the Zig language itself.93% similarUnverifiedLLMs lack grounding capability and cannot verify generated linguistic symbols against real-world states.66% similarUnverifiedLarge language models cannot reliably distinguish the boundary between system instructions and user/external content during inference—this is a fundamental limitation of prompt injection, similar in principle to SQL injection.65% similarUnverifiedLarge language models are architecturally incapable of strictly distinguishing between system instructions and user data, which is a fundamental flaw at the architectural level.64% similarUnverified对大语言模型而言，不要做X的约束有时比要做Y的指令更有效，因为模型在开放式创作任务中更容易被负样本锚定64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/32559API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/32559MCP
get_claim(id=32559)