Unverified60% confidenceFactTime unknown
MySQL's LIMIT offset, N pagination method has a deep pagination performance problem: even if only N records need to be returned, it must first scan and discard the preceding offset records.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedTraditional offset pagination tends to have problems when data is frequently added or deleted, such as skipping items or returning duplicates.73% similarUnverifiedPagination with a large offset becomes a performance bottleneck, as LIMIT 50 OFFSET 100000 requires the database to process and discard a large number of preceding rows; keyset pagination uses the last record of the previous page as the starting point for the next page query, and is suitable for infinite scrolling, activity feeds, and large transaction histories, while offset pagination is still useful when users need direct access to any page number.70% similarUnverifiedBatch list APIs typically use cursor-based pagination rather than offset-based pagination, because offset-based pagination has performance issues with large data volumes.69% similarUnverifiedWhen incrementally pulling Stripe data, boundary issues exist: multiple records generated within the same second may span pages, timestamp precision is limited, and after a network failure it is necessary to retry from the previous cursor.68% similarUnverifiedTraditional relational databases (such as MySQL and PostgreSQL) can experience performance bottlenecks in high-concurrency write scenarios due to locking mechanisms, write amplification, and primary-replica replication latency.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/35986API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/35986MCP
get_claim(id=35986)