Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Under the same model (Claude 4.6 Opus), OCR's precision is 33.9% versus 7.23% for the general-purpose agent, representing an approximately 4.7× improvement in precision.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Alibaba's Open-Source OCR: An AI Code Review Solution with 4.7x Better Precision and 14x Fewer Tokens
bilibiliAI_transfer6/25/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedClaude Opus 4.7 at an intermediate checkpoint achieves a pass rate of 57%, yet its final accuracy is only 39.8%72% similarUnverifiedQwen 3.6 approaches or even surpasses Claude 4.5 Opus on certain metrics in dimensions such as multi-turn agent-enhanced capabilities69% similarUnverifiedIn guided mode, the average end-to-end accuracy increased from 28.6% to 33.7%, and the ambiguity detection F1 score increased from 45.3% to 64.9%69% similarVerifiedClaude Sonnet 5 scores 63.22% on SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding), approximately 6 percentage points behind Opus 4.8.65% similarUnverifiedOpus 4.7's click accuracy matches that of Sonnet 4.6, while also offering the strongest reasoning capabilities.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/41098API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/41098MCP
get_claim(id=41098)