Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
Under the ARR model, a monthly submission window is open for papers, and after reviews are completed by a unified reviewer pool, authors can submit their papers along with review comments to the program committees of different conferences.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
The Pain of AI Paper Peer Review: Why Should Models Released After the Deadline Count Against You?
redditr/LanguageTechnology7/9/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn ARR's rolling review model, researchers can submit papers at any time and the system assigns reviewers on a monthly basis rather than being constrained by a single conference deadline77% similarVerifiedACL ARR review results can be reused within a certain cycle; authors may choose to commit to a conference or Findings, or withdraw and re-enter with existing reviews in a subsequent cycle.75% similarUnverifiedIn ARR, submission and entry into review are two separate events; the system waits until the cycle deadline to formally begin assignment for that batch of papers.71% similarUnverifiedThe core idea of rolling review is to shift paper review from an annual concentrated model to year-round continuous acceptance and processing, allowing authors to submit at any time.70% similarUnverified拿到评审分数后，作者可以选择将论文commit到某场会议或Findings，也可以撤回并携带已有评审在后续周期重新参与69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/476187API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/476187MCP
get_claim(id=476187)