Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
人类评估者往往对流畅、自信、符合直觉的回答给予更高评分，这是奉承偏差（Sycophancy）的形成根源
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
AI欺骗行为：为何无需意识同样危险
Related Claims
UnverifiedHuman annotators exhibit a cognitive bias toward more information being better when evaluating answers, causing reward models to implicitly link length with quality, which is one of the causes of model verbosity.75% similarUnverifiedResearch shows that human evaluators in RLHF tend to prefer longer, more detailed, and friendlier-toned responses, even when those responses are not superior in factual accuracy.75% similarUnverifiedIn RLHF, human evaluators tend to give higher scores to answers that are structurally complete and politely worded when making subjective creative judgments; this bias is referred to as a variant of reward hacking.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/510858API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/510858MCP
get_claim(id=510858)