Expired50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Setting exclusion rules such as .aiignore for AI programming tools can isolate sensitive files, but their effectiveness depends on faithful execution by the client and constitutes a soft control.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/16/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/14/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified将AI行为规则写入版本控制系统中的配置文件，使AI行为约束可以像代码规范（ESLint、Prettier配置）一样被团队共享和审查75% similarUnverifiedWhen using AI Agents, the principle of least privilege should be followed, avoiding granting sensitive permissions such as email, files, and servers from the outset, to guard against risks such as prompt injection attacks.73% similarUnverifiedSetting permissions for an AI coding assistant too narrowly requires manual confirmation at each step, degrading it to semi-automatic mode; setting them too broadly risks serious consequences such as file deletion and credential leakage due to hallucinations or injection attacks.73% similarUnverifiedThe question of AI liability attribution is commonly evaded through instrumentalism by characterizing AI as a tool rather than an agent, thereby transferring responsibility to the user.72% similarUnverifiedFor scenarios running AI-generated code, a default policy of 'read-only filesystem + no network access' can be set for the AI agent to reduce the risk of loss of control.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/528372API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/528372MCP
get_claim(id=528372)