Verified65% confidenceTradeoffExact time
Excessively frequent human intervention eliminates the efficiency advantages of automation, while an overly lenient approval scope fails to effectively prevent and control risks — this is the trade-off in HITL granularity design
3
Sources
65%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedOver-optimizing for Agents may introduce new security and abuse risks by lowering the threshold for automated crawling and bulk operations.78% similarUnverifiedThe manual approval pause mechanism sacrifices some efficiency in exchange for survivability in audit scenarios.77% similarUnverifiedThe placement of HITL involves engineering trade-offs: intervening too early diminishes automation benefits, while intervening too late may allow errors to accumulate to a point where they are difficult to correct76% similarVerifiedExcessive safety fine-tuning can cause models to over-refuse, undermining their practical utility.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/533630API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/533630MCP
get_claim(id=533630)