Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
OpenAI published a dedicated research report, Sycophancy to Subterfuge, tracking and evaluating models' ability to maintain truthful judgments under repeated pressure across multiple turns.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/17/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/15/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedOrganizations such as OpenAI and Anthropic have begun adopting Dynamic Benchmarks strategies, periodically updating test sets and introducing adversarial samples to maintain evaluation validity69% similarUnverifiedOpenAI introduced monitoring upgrades such as activation probes as an engineering application of mechanistic interpretability research to detect potentially harmful intent.68% similarUnverifiedOpenAI applies Constitutional AI thinking to align outputs with values and uses red-team testing to uncover dangerous capability boundaries before release.65% similarUnverifiedOpenAI Preparedness团队的核心目标是在模型具备危险能力的早期阶段发现并评估这些能力62% similarUnverifiedOpenAI引入了激活探针（Activation Probes）监控机制，通过监控模型内部神经网络激活状态检测潜在有害思维模式61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/537780API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/537780MCP
get_claim(id=537780)