Expired50% confidenceFactTime unknown
Pure reasoning models like Chain of Thought cannot access external tools and may reach wrong conclusions due to gaps in training data.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
ReAct vs. CodeAct: Two Core Approaches to Agent Tool Calling
bilibili研究院张Q
Related Claims
UnverifiedPrompt engineering techniques such as chain-of-thought, few-shot prompting, and self-consistency cannot enable a model to access information beyond its training cutoff date, cannot guarantee the precision of floating-point arithmetic, and cannot handle external files the model has never seen.79% similarUnverifiedArun认为一个为优秀推理训练的模型不可能同时擅长检索，因为推理和检索会争夺参数空间76% similarUnverified反事实问题能有效区分真正理解与模式匹配，因为这类问题几乎不可能直接出现在训练语料中73% similarUnverifiedLatent space reasoning lacks natural supervision signals—there is no ground truth to determine whether a given hidden vector represents correct thinking—which remains an engineering challenge that has not been fully resolved.70% similarUnverifiedThe author recommends disabling thinking, on the grounds that most use cases for building agents or simple applications do not require deep reasoning, and LangChain's compatibility with thinking mode is not yet complete.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/54231API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/54231MCP
get_claim(id=54231)