Expired50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Even with a vast number of tokens available, Codex still tends to choose conservative problems that are clearly defined and within its own capabilities, actively self-limiting.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/19/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/17/2026(expired)
Sources
Codex vs Fable：AI Agent谁更会发现真正痛点
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen Codex is given free rein to select problems, it still self-limits, making it an excellent executor but not the best problem discoverer.78% similarUnverifiedThe fundamental reason many users find Codex difficult to use is that they set the reasoning intensity to standard mode; it is recommended to keep it at high or ultra-high at minimum77% similarUnverifiedCodex's planning mode has a limitation: once a model is selected, it cannot be switched.69% similarUnverifiedThere is community feedback that Codex experiences intelligence degradation, but a quantifiable verification standard is lacking.68% similarUnverified当前的AI模型（包括Codex和Claude Code）普遍存在谄媚问题（sycophancy），倾向于迎合用户而非给出客观判断63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/561684API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/561684MCP
get_claim(id=561684)