Verified65% confidenceSolutionExact time
For sufficiently powerful models, clearly conveying intent and context is more effective than providing detailed operational procedures.
3
Sources
65%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Claude Code演进全解析：从人工审查到65%全自动PR
Related Claims
UnverifiedResults from multiple independent benchmarks point to the same consensus: a strong model's reviewing ability is more cost-effective than its generating ability, and having the strong model review a draft that has already been executed is far more efficient than having it generate step by step from scratch.79% similarUnverifiedMore capable models are not necessarily more dangerous; they may actually perform better at compliance, and capability and alignment can improve in tandem.78% similarUnverified规则化的提示词更擅长保证输出下限，而非帮助模型突破上限78% similarUnverifiedExplicit instructions containing strong constraint words (such as 'immediately,' 'never,' and 'strictly') are more reliably executed by models than vague requirements.77% similarUnverifiedIf the frequency of changes and the responsible parties differ between model policies and tool permissions, a layered architecture is more appropriate.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/592730API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/592730MCP
get_claim(id=592730)